Vutrisiran: Post-Hoc Analysis of the HELIOS-B Monotherapy Population with Observations Following Tafamidis Initiation Censored
Download PDF
Vutrisiran: Post-Hoc Analysis of the HELIOS-B Monotherapy Population with Observations Following Tafamidis Initiation Censored
The full Prescribing Information for AMVUTTRA® (vutrisiran) is provided here. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals does not recommend the use of its products in any manner that is inconsistent with the approved Prescribing Information. This resource may contain information that is not in the approved Prescribing Information.
If you are seeking additional scientific information related to Alnylam medicines, you may visit the Alnylam US Medical Affairs website at RNAiScience.com.
Summary
o Endpoints in the HELIOS-B study were prespecified for assessment in both the overall population and the monotherapy population (defined as patients not receiving tafamidis at baseline).1 o In the monotherapy population, 21.5% of patients initiated tafamidis after randomization.2 o Treatment with vutrisiran reduced the risk of the primary composite of all-cause mortality and recurrent CV events in both the overall population (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.56, 0.93; P=0.01) and monotherapy population (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49, 0.93; P=0.02).1 o The incidence of AEs were similar in both treatment groups.1
|
Study Design – Efficacy Results – Safety Results – Abbreviations – References
HELIOS-B was a phase 3, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vutrisiran in patients with ATTR-CM, including both hATTR and wtATTR. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either vutrisiran 25 mg (n=326) or placebo (n=329) every 3 months by subcutaneous injection for up to 36 months. After the double-blind period, all remaining eligible patients were allowed to receive vutrisiran in an OLE.1
Endpoints were prespecified for assessment in both the overall population and the monotherapy population (patients not receiving tafamidis at baseline). The primary endpoint was the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and recurrent CV events (CV hospitalizations and urgent heart failure visits) at the end of the double-blind period.1
A total of 395 patients were not on tafamidis at baseline and comprised the monotherapy population. Patients that were not receiving tafamidis at baseline could initiate tafamidis at the discretion of the investigator. In the monotherapy population, a total of 21.5% of patients initiated tafamidis after randomization in a median (IQR) of 18 (12-28 months), which included 44 out of 196 patients (22%) in the vutrisiran group and 41 out of 199 patients (21%) in the placebo group.1,2
Post-Hoc Analysis
A post-hoc analysis of data from the monotherapy population with observations after tafamidis initiation censored was conducted to further assess the monotherapy population in the HELIOS-B study.2
Primary Endpoint: Composite of All-Cause Mortality and Recurrent CV Events Through the Double‑Blind Period
With censoring of observations after tafamidis initiation in the monotherapy population, treatment with vutrisiran compared with placebo resulted in a HR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.49, 0.95) in the composite of all-cause mortality and recurrent CV events (Figure 1). The reduction in risk of the composite of all‑cause mortality and recurrent events was consistent with the result observed from the primary analysis without censoring (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49, 0.93; P=0.02).2
Figure 1. All-Cause Mortality and Recurrent CV Events in the Monotherapy Population With and Without Censoring of Observations After Tafamidis Initiation.2
Abbreviations: ATTR = transthyretin amyloidosis; CI = confidence interval; CV = cardiovascular; HR = hazard ratio; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro‑B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA = New York Heart Association.
HR derived using the modified Andersen-Gill model stratified by baseline tafamidis use, with treatment group, log-transformed NT-proBNP, type of ATTR, NYHA class, and age group as covariates.
Primary analysis at May 2024 data cut.
From Witteles et al.2
Secondary Endpoints
A summary of the secondary endpoints assessed in the monotherapy population with and without censoring of observations after tafamidis initiation are presented in Table 1.2
Table 1. Secondary Endpoints Assessed in the Monotherapy Population.2
Endpoint | Monotherapy Population with Censoring (n=395) | Monotherapy Population without Censoring (n=395) | ||
Treatment Effect | p-value | Treatment Effect | p-value | |
All-cause mortality up to 42 months, HR (95% CI)a | 0.59 (0.39, 0.89) | 0.012 | 0.61 (0.42, 0.90) | 0.016 |
Change from baseline in 6-MWT at Month 30, LS mean difference (95% CI) | 28.67 (9.35, 47.99) | 0.004 | 32.09 (14.03, 50.15) | <0.001 |
Change from baseline in KCCQ-OS at Month 30, LS mean difference (95% CI) | 9.32 (4.43, 14.21) | <0.001 | 8.69 (3.98, 13.40) | <0.001 |
Change from baseline in NYHA class at Month 30: % stable or improved, adjusted % difference (95% CI) | 13.6 (2.6, 24.5) | 0.015 | 12.5 (2.7, 22.5) | 0.010 |
Abbreviations: 6-MWT = 6-minute walk test; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; KCCQ-OS = Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire‑Overall Summary; LS = least squares; NYHA = New York Heart Association.
aHR is derived from a Cox proportional hazards model at November 2024 data cut, incorporating inverse probability of censoring weights to adjust for informative censoring.
A summary of the safety results observed during the double-blind period in the monotherapy population with and without censoring of observations after tafamidis initiation are presented in Table 2.2
Table 2. Safety Results in the Monotherapy Population During the Double-Blind Period.2
AEs, n (%) | Monotherapy Population with Censoring | Monotherapy Population without Censoring | ||
Vutrisiran (n=196) | Placebo (n=199) | Vutrisiran (n=196) | Placebo (n=199) | |
Any AE | 191 (97.4) | 190 (95.5) | 192 (98.0) | 194 (97.5) |
Treatment-related | 17 (8.7) | 22 (11.1) | 18 (9.2) | 23 (11.6) |
SAEs | 104 (53.1) | 127 (63.8) | 112 (57.1) | 135 (67.8) |
Treatment-related | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) |
Severe AEs | 86 (43.9) | 119 (59.8) | 93 (47.4) | 126 (63.3) |
Treatment-related | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 1 (0.5) |
AEs leading to study drug interruption | 6 (3.1) | 5 (2.5) | 6 (3.1) | 5 (2.5) |
Treatment-related | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 0 |
AEs leading to study drug discontinuation | 6 (3.1) | 10 (5.0) | 6 (3.1) | 10 (5.0) |
Treatment-related | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AEs leading to study withdrawal | 1 (0.5) | 4 (2.0) | 1 (0.5) | 4 (2.0) |
Treatment-related | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deaths | 36 (18.4) | 42 (21.1) | 37 (18.9) | 43 (21.6) |
Abbreviations: AE = adverse event; SAE = serious adverse event.
6-MWT = 6-minute walk test; AE = adverse event; ATTR = transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTR-CM = transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy; CI = confidence interval; CV = cardiovascular; hATTR = hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis; HR = hazard ratio; IQR = interquartile range; KCCQ‑OS = Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire‑Overall Summary; LS = least squares; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro‑B‑type natriuretic peptide; NYHA = New York Heart Association; OLE = open-label extension; SAE = serious adverse event; wtATTR = wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis.
Updated 30 September 2025
|
|
|
MED-ALL-VUTRI-2500051 1.0 Approved through Oct 2027 |