Givosiran: Use in Patients Without an Identified Porphyria-Related Mutation

Download PDF

 

Givosiran: Use in Patients Without an Identified Porphyria-Related Mutation

The following information is provided in response to your unsolicited inquiry. It is intended to provide you with a review of the available scientific literature and to assist you in forming your own conclusions in order to make healthcare decisions. This document is not for further dissemination or publication without authorization.

The full Prescribing Information for GIVLAARI® (givosiran) is provided here. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals does not recommend the use of its products in any manner that is inconsistent with the approved Prescribing Information. This resource may contain information that is not in the approved Prescribing Information.

If you are seeking additional scientific information related to Alnylam medicines, you may visit the Alnylam US Medical Affairs website at RNAiScience.com.

SUMMARY

  • The phase 3 ENVISION study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of givosiran in patients with a documented diagnosis of AHP.1
  • Of the 94 patients enrolled in the study, 2 patients had AHP without an identified genetic mutation.1
  • The efficacy of givosiran in the 2 patients without an identified genetic mutation is provided in Table 1.1,2
  • Additional information regarding the safety of givosiran in the two patients without an identified genetic mutation is not available.

INDEX

Clinical DataAbbreviationsReferences

Clinical data

The ENVISION study was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of givosiran in patients with a documented diagnosis of AHP. Enrolled patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive subcutaneous injections of givosiran 2.5 mg/kg (n=48) or placebo (n=46) once a month for 6 months, followed by an optional 30-month OLE. The primary endpoint was the annualized rate of composite porphyria attacks among patients with AIP at 6 months.1

Of the 94 patients enrolled in the study, 2 patients had AHP without an identified genetic mutation. Both patients were subsequently assessed by the investigator as having AIP on the basis of biochemical analysis. Both patients were enrolled in the placebo crossover group, where they switched from placebo to givosiran treatment following the 6-month double blind period.1

Efficacy Results

Efficacy results from ENVISION as of July 23, 2019 for these patients are provided in Table 1.2

Table 1. Efficacy Results in AHP Patients Without Identified Genetic Mutations in ENVISION.2

 

Patient 1a

Patient 2

Exposure

 

 

Number of doses of givosiran received

2

9

Total follow-up on givosiran (days)

56

233

Efficacy

 

 

Composite AARb

 

 

Historical AAR

10

4

6-month double-blind period

21.6

0

During givosiran treatment

1c

0

Secondary Endpoints

 

 

ALA, mmol/mol Cr

 

 

Baseline

23.10

15.68

Month 6

12.12

17.07

Last value

3.93 (Month 7)

1.73 (Month 14)

PBG, mmol/mol Cr

 

 

Baseline

45.52

15.68

Month 6

32.96

17.07

Last value

11.45 (Month 7)

3.38 (Month 14)

Days of hemin use

 

 

6-month double-blind period

0

0

During givosiran treatment

0

0

Abbreviations: AAR = annualized attack rate; ALA = aminolevulinic acid; Cr = creatinine; PBG = porphobilinogen.

Data presented as of data cutoff date of July 23, 2019.

aPatient discontinued study drug on Day 197 (Day 29 on givosiran) and withdrew from the study on Day 224 (Day 56 on givosiran).

bA composite porphyria attack was defined as an attack that resulted in hospitalization, an urgent health care visit, or intravenous administration of hemin at home.3

cAAR was calculated for patients who had at least 85 days of follow-up during the OLE period. Patient withdrew from the study before 85 days of follow-up; therefore, number of attacks is presented here.

Safety Results

A summary of AEs reported at the end of the OLE is shown in Table 2. The safety results presented below represent the total population of the ENVISION study.1

Table 2. Summary of Patients with ≥1 Adverse Event.1

Patients with ≥1 Event, n (%)

Placebo Crossover (N=46)

Continuous Givosiran (N=48)

All Patients

(N=94)

Any AE

44 (96)

47 (98)

91 (97)

SAE

17 (37)

20 (42)

37 (39)

Severe AE

18 (39)

17 (35)

35 (37)

AE leading to treatment discontinuation

4 (9)

2 (4)

6 (6)

AE leading to study withdrawal

2 (4)

2 (4)

4 (4)

Death

0

1 (2)

1 (1)

Abbreviations: AE = adverse event; SAE = serious adverse event.

 

Additional information regarding the safety of givosiran in the two patients without an identified genetic mutation is not available. 

Abbreviations

AE = adverse event; AHP = acute hepatic porphyria; AIP = acute intermittent porphyria; OLE = open-label extension.

Updated 13 January 2025

References

1.  Kuter DJ, Bonkovsky HL, Monroy S, et al. Efficacy and safety of givosiran for acute hepatic porphyria: Final results of the randomized phase III ENVISION trial. J Hepatol. 2023;79(5):1150-1158. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2023.06.013

2.  Givlaari : EPAR – Public assessment report. European Medicines Agency. Published March 09, 2020. Accessed January 13, 2025. https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/assessment-report/givlaari-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.

3.  Balwani M, Sardh E, Ventura P, et al. Phase 3 Trial of RNAi Therapeutic Givosiran for Acute Intermittent Porphyria. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(24):2289-2301. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1913147

 

 

 

MED-ALL-AS1-2400004 2.0 Approved through Feb 2027

 

Download PDF